5 Reasons I Don't Have a Kindle

Kindle: Amazon's New Wireless Reading Device, $399.00

Several people have asked me for a demo of an Amazon Kindle, just assuming that I have one. It's a logical assumption to make: two of my greatest loves are books and gadgets. And since the Kindle is a gadget for reading books, you'd think it would be a no-brainer. Yet I do not have one, and currently I have no intention of getting one.

It's not that I don't like the idea - far from it. I've been waiting for years for a good electronic book reader to appear, and I've tried out several over the years. I used a Rocket eBook for about six months on and off: too heavy, screen was too hard to read. I read a few books on my old Palm Tungsten: screen too small, too hard to read for long periods of time.

I used a Fujitsu Stylistic Tablet PC for about a year, and used its electronic book software quite a bit, purchasing dozens of books from Fictionwise.com. That was the best yet, but using a PC as a reader - even a tablet laptop that didn't have a keyboard - was way overkill. It was heavy, got very hot, and the buttons weren't suited very well for page flipping. I also felt that using a $3,000 laptop for reading a book was... well, just wrong.

I thought about getting a Sony Reader, but felt that it was overpriced and underpowered, even for an electronic book reader. I guess my earlier experience with the Rocket eBook has made me more discerning. In addition, thanks to my Apple-powered technological renaissance, I have a new-found appreciation for style in addition to function, and I found the Sony product lacking. It simply didn't feel like reading a book to me, and it also looks kind of tacky.

The Kindle is supposed to be the first device that lets you buy and read books electronically - without the need for any computer to connect it to. It was featured on the cover of Newsweek. Its debut made the nightly news the day it came out. It was sneak-peeked and revewed by numerous technology writers and blogs. And I still don't have one.

Here's why I don't have one, and what I'm waiting for before I buy an electronic book reader:

5. It's Too Expensive. A book reader is, or at least should be, a single function product: You use it to read books. It's not a computer, it's not a web browser, it's not an MP3 player. It's a device to read books. And using the time-honored analogy of the razor and razor blades, the reader itself simply should not cost very much money. My Rocket eBook was $199.00. My Palm Tungsten was $179.000. An iPod is $149.00. A Blu-Ray player is $299.00. An Nintendo Wii is $249.00. And Amazon wants to charge me $399.00 for a device to read books? I don't think so. An electronic book reader should cost no more than $150.00 maximum, and should preferably be under $100.00.

4. The Books are Copy-Protected. DRM (Digital Rights Management) rears its ugly head yet again. I am especially disappointed to see Amazon taking this tact, since they have done such a nice job with their MP3 store. I've spent over $100.00 at Amazon's MP3 store since they started, and I'm going to be spending a lot more over the coming year now that they have 3 of the 4 record labels supplying them with content.

Books for the Kindle are in a proprietary, copy-protected format. It's such a closed format, in fact, that there is no way to simply copy your own material to the device - you have to email a document to Amazon, pay a fee, and then have them send the converted document back to you. A collection of books, just like a collection of music, is something I like to keep forever. Purchasing a book in some transitory, proprietary format that I cannot even back up is of no interest to me. An electronic book reader should use an open format and should not use any form of DRM or copy protection. Ideally, it should also read multiple formats, with PDF at the top of the list.

3. The Screen is Too Small. The Kindle uses exactly the same screen as the Sony Reader. The good news here is that the screen quality is excellent: it actually looks as good as a printed page. The high contrast black and white screen with very high resolution print is just the breakthrough that has been needed in order to make an electronic book reader a viable product. But after playing with a Sony Reader for a while, and after comparing it to a paperback book, a trade paperback, and a normal-size hardcover, it was clear that the 6" screen is just plain too small.

Here's my simple rule of thumb: Get a physical paperback edition and an electronic edition of the same book. Turn to a page. They should be identical. With the 6" screen the Kindle uses, that is not the case: there is always less text on the Kindle's screen. This means that a 300 page printed book ends up as a 400 page Kindle book, for example (I'm approximating, since I do not have a Kindle to do the actual comparison with). And the small size just doesn't feel like a book. Pick up a trade paperback or a hardcover book; an electronic book reader should have the same screen size as the printed page on any of those, including page headers and footers. Assuming the same screen technology used by the Kindle and the Sony Reader, an electronic book reader should have a screen that is at least 8" tall and 5" wide (9.5" diagonal), and should be able to support page-for-page matching between the printed version and the electronic version of the same book.

2. The Books are Too Expensive. I place this one a lot higher than the device costs, because if all the other issues were dealt with, I'd probably be willing to pay more for the device itself. However, an electronic book must always be cheaper than the paperback version of a book. And right now this is not the case.

Amazon is trying to get away with comparing the hardcover price with the Kindle version price, in order to justify their price range of $9.95 to $7.95 for electronic books. Sorry, folks, but that's not the comparison. Let's take The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini as an example. The paperback version of this book is $8.99. The Kindle version of this book is $8.99 - the same price. But - I can give the paperback book to someone else. I can keep it forever. I can make copies of it if I need to. I can re-bind the book in 20 years. I can re-read it 10 years from now just by pulling it off the shelf. I can't do any of these things with the Kindle version - and yet it's exactly the same price. Why would I ever bother with the electronic version? Books for an electronic reader should be priced well below the price of the paperback version of the same book - at least $2.00 cheaper, in my opinion, since there are no physical costs associated with it. And that's assuming that all of my other points have been addressed. If the book is copy-protectecd, it should be at least $4.00 less than the paperback!

1. The Kindle is Butt Ugly. This is the 21st century. We expected our devices to look like it. Look at an Apple iPhone, a Toyota Prius, a Panasonic plasma TV, a Samsung laser printer, an iPod Nano, even a single cup coffee maker. I expect smooth lines, smart design. I expect gadgets that are as beautiful to look at and as pleasing to the touch as the best of these. Asking me to pay $400 for something that looks like it was designed by a Soviet planning committee is not going to cut it. I mean, look at this thing! It's all sharp edges and angles. It's the same bland off-white color as generic PC's from the 1990s. The keyboard (and why the hell does a book reader even need a keyboard, anyway?) looks like it belongs on a Fisher-Price toy.

The whole look of the device is just wrong. It looks cheap and flimsy - even though it is neither. In an age of shiny piano black surfaces, aluminum finishes, aerodynamic shapes and streamlined edges, the Amazon Kindle is an orphan. I get the impression someone designed the shape and layout about 20 years ago, and has just been waiting for the technology to finally allow it to be built. Amazon should have hired a high-end industrial designer and made this product a beauty, something to show off, instead of something to keep hidden under a cover so that no one could see it. An electronic book reader should be attractive, sleek, and well designed.

So, Amazon, no sale to me. I thought for sure the Kindle would flop big time, and yet when I checked Amazon for information while writing this entry, I see that they are currently sold out. Obviously, quite a lot of customers don't have the misgivings that I do. I'll just keep waiting. My guess is it will take another 5 years or so until an electronic book reader appears that follows all 5 of my suggestions. I look forward to writing a glowing review of that product at such time as I can get one.

Sadly, however, the Amazon Kindle is not that device.


You can list all the *other* products you've owned until you're blue in the face. It doesn't qualify you to review a product you have never even seen, let alone touched and used.

While your points are all reasonable, it doesn't change the fact that buying, reading, storing books and periodicals on the Kindle has entirely changed my reading habits. It's been totally worth the $400 to me. DRM is not an issue - yet. If it becomes one, I'll deal with it then. In the meantime, I'm *really* enjoying reading for hours every day on my Kindle.

You can fit more text on the screen if you reduce the font size.

I don't think the books are too expensive. Paperbacks are even uglier than the Kindle. And my Kindle books won't wear out, and Amazon will (presumably) store a copy for me indefinitely. Can't share them, which sucks, but I don't honestly share that many books anyway.

It is rather ugly, but I'm spending my time looking at the screen reading, which is what I bought it for. Ugly goes away.

Flawed as it may be, I love it and can't wait until version 2.0!

One more negative review by a person who doesn't have a Kindle, and probably has not even touched one,and is also full of factual errors. I disagree with just about everything said here, and I've had my Kindle for just about one month.

The Kindle is a wonderful ebook reader -- and I've owned just about all of it's predecessors. I also hate DRM, but there is no need to ever have any DRM books on your Kindle -- you can easily move your own ebooks to your Kindle using the supplied USB cable.
The acceptable book formats are also very flexible, and you will have no trouble doing just that. But Kindle will do that for you for the huge fee of just ten cents -- and I think I can afford that.


I totally agree with you. Sorry it came across as a "review". I was just trying to say why I wasn't buying one; I didn't intend to make it sound like an actual review of the device. If I had a chance to actually get my hands on one without having to order it blindly, I might very well change my mind.

Although I do think it's fair to talk about the screen, since Amazon states clearly that it is exactly the same screen as the Sony Reader.


I, also, can't wait for version 2.0! I also very much wish Amazon would do some sort of partnership with a brick-and-mortar operation so there is at least some chance of being able to get hands-on with the device. $400 for something that I can't even handle first is a lot to ask...


Points taken... I guess I should have said that one true factor affecting my decision is that I don't know of any way to touch / handle / test a Kindle without actually buying one. I'm basing most of my opinions on Amazon's statements that the screen is exactly the same as the Sony Reader. So, truthfully, if I'm going to spend $400, I at least want someplace where I can try it out first.

I'd be interested in knowing exactly what the factual errors are, however. I did try to verify all my facts while writing the entry, but obviously I didn't get everything right.

I respectfully disagree with the comment about the "huge fee" of 10 cents per document... if the reader supported just one open format, the cost would be zero. 10 cents could add up awfully fast if you're trying to do a lot of documents. It reminds me of the old days of cell phones when you had to worry about every single minute you talked...

About the 10 cent fee, you may instead have the converted documents emailed to you. You then copy them via USB to the Kindle. It's free that way. I think the address is yourname@free.kindle.com. I haven't tried it yet, since for 10 cents it's just so convenient to have them do it for me :)

You're right about spending $400 on something you can't handle first. Be careful though, if you do handle one, you'll turn the page accidentally for the first hour or two. Gets better after that.

Leave a comment


Recent Entries

  • Diary of a Wimpy Kid

    Diary of a Wimpy Kid (2007) by Jeff Kinney. Amulet Books, 218 pages. Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Rodrick Rules (2008) by Jeff Kinney....

  • President-Elect Barack Obama

    Frank and I had settled in for a long night of watching election returns. We had both arranged to take off work the day...

  • The Age of American Unreason

    The Age of American Unreason by Susan Jacoby (2008). Pantheon Books, 356 pages. Remember the term "Highbrow"? You don't hear that much anymore. Nor...

  • Early Voting in Florida

    Yesterday I spent 2 hours voting. Since I live in Florida, The State That Doesn't Know How to Hold An Election, I figured I...

  • The Big Bang Theory

    The Big Bang Theory. Mondays on CBS, 8:00pm ET/PT As a genre, the sitcom has seen better days. For the past four years, since...

  • MacBook Pro

    Apple MacBook Pro. 15" Display, 2.53 Ghz Core 2 Duo Processor, 4GB RAM, 320 GB Hard Drive. Since Apple moved to using Intel chips 3...

  • A Dream Transcription

    A few nights ago I woke up in the middle of the night, needing to use the bathroom. I was right in the middle of...

  • Monty Python's Life of Brian

    Monty Python's Life of Brian (1979). 83 minutes, Handmade Films / Sony Pictures. Directed by Terry Jones. It was the fall of 1979. I...

  • The 700 Billion Dollar Bailout

    It feels like it's 1990 all over again. Remember 1990? The Savings and Loan Crisis? It's arguably what cost George H.W. Bush the 1992 election....

  • Two Books I Didn't Finish

    Friends, family, and the very small number of readers of this blog who do not fall into either of those two categories know that I...