Categories
Thoughts and Comments

An Underwater Scare

This past weekend, I completed six dives to receive my PADI Advanced Diver certification. I’ve been an Open Water diver since August of 2004, and a Nitrox diver since August of 2005, and finally decided to take the next step so that I can “officially” dive deeper spots without having to be escorted by an instructor or Dive Master.

Part of this set of dives was my first true night dive. I have done a couple of dives in the early evening, and one time with my friend Adam and his girlfriend Jeannette we did actually dive using lights as it got twilight-y, but never before in actual complete darkness. So at 8pm on Saturday, July 7th (lucky 7/7/07!), I’m out on the American Dream II, off on my first night dive. I’ve dove off the American Dream II before, and I’m comfortable with the boat, so all signs pointed to a good time.

The first dive, a 70 ft trip to the wreck of the Captain Ramon, was fun. It wasn’t completely dark, so it had a cool deep twilight vibe about it. Although we did use lights, strictly speaking they weren’t necessary. The only annoying thing about the dive was that I had a lot of trouble clearing my mask – it seem to keep filling up with water a lot faster than normal. I did not pay much attention to it at the time…

A little over an hour later, and now it’s pitch dark outside. Around 9:30 pm, I dive in again, this time for a true “in the dark” dive along the Barracuda Reef. I’m diving with a fellow named Chris, one of my classmates in this certification course – whom I had never met prior to this. And almost right away, my mask problem comes back. Water keeps filling up my mask. I clear it, it refills, I clear it, it refills… very annoying.

And to make matters worse, Chris and I keep getting further from the main group, because each time I clear my mask, I’m pausing in mid-water to push and fiddle with my mask, while of course holding my light and trying not to blind anyone else with it. Finally, I take the mask off completely, because I decided that I must’ve put it on wrong, or got one of the straps somehow under the sealing area. I straighten it out, put it back on… but no matter what I do, I can’t keep the water out of the mask.

By this point, my eyes were really stinging from the constant bath of salt water, and I really can’t see anyone else at all. And it is pitch black. And I am about 35 feet underwater. And I haven’t seen any of my gauges for the past 10 minutes, so I’m not 100% sure of my actual depth. لعبة اونو كام ورقة So I’m not 100% sure if it’s safe for me to ascend or not.

And at this point I realize that something must be truly wrong with my mask. I take it off and put it back on again, and this time water rushes in constantly – it will not clear for even a moment. The only thing I can see is the faint glow from the chemical light attached to my buddy’s tank. I wave my light at him, hoping he’ll get the message. The light moves closer, and I reach out until I can feel his tank – since I can’t see anything to speak of underwater and in the dark. I tap at my mask, make a slashing signal with my hands, and give the “thumbs up” signal meaning I have to ascend. Chris gets it, and we head up.

Luckily for me, even though Chris had no idea exactly what my problem was, he did get that I had a problem, and so he managed our ascent slowly and properly. When we surfaced, I explained the problem, and examined my mask. Holding my light up to it, I found that the glass front had ripped away from the plastic seal, leaving about a 1 inch gap at the top. Which explained why water kept rushing in. And why I could not clear it.

No one else from our group was visible. Chris told me that although he tried signaling, everyone else was swimming quickly and purposefully along the reef, and no one saw him. Another problem with diving in the dark that we hadn’t considered!

We spotted the boat about 200 yards away. Since it was not an “emergency” by any means, neither of us signaled to the boat. We inflated our BC’s (that’s “Buoyancy Control Device” or “the vest that fills up with air” for non-divers) and started back-stroking towards the boat.

At one point, Chris paused. “Was that you that just brushed my leg”? he said. “Uh…. probably”, I said. We both turned our lights back on. Neither of us said anything out loud, but I at least was thinking that while I’ve never been afraid of anything I’ve encountered while diving, it’s a very different matter when you’re swimming on the surface in the dark.

But we arrived at the boat without incident. I apologized to Chris for ruining his dive, and he made a joking comment that I was now destined to be “That Guy” who couldn’t complete the night dive and had to come back early. I said I’d gladly accept that label, as soon as my eyes stopped stinging. العاب كوتشينة لشخصين

About a half an hour later, everyone else returned. And of course, we had both missed some incredible night diving sights, including seeing some of the coral reef feeding in the dark. My instructor John complemented both of us on keeping our heads, and gave Chris props for acting like a proper dive buddy.

And that was pretty much that. Strangely, I was never really scared (well, OK, a little bit), but I sure was annoyed. I was never in any real danger, but I have to say that not being able to see while deep under water in the pitch dark is not an experience I care to repeat.

The next day, I bought a new mask and tossed the old one in the trash. Thankfully, the final 2 dives the next day were perfect, and I got to try my new mask out down to 110 feet (the wreck of the Rebel). And despite my scare of the night before, I was struck by why I love to scuba dive… there is something about the eerie beauty of a coral-encrusted shipwreck, deep beneath the oceans’ surface, that strikes my soul. The peace and serenity of life at 100 feet underwater cannot be beat.

After the deep wreck dive, we finished off the certification with an hour-long drift dive on Oakland Reef, where our naturalist Dive Master Andrew pointed out many interesting fauna, including a golden eel, snapping shrimp, sea stars, and a strange spider-looking creature with a blue cupola on the top.

When the boat docked, instructor John announced that we were all Advanced Divers now, and signed all the appropriate logs. I exchanged phone numbers and email addresses with my classmates, and loaded up the Mini with my tanks and gear. As I was closing up, someone parked next to me commented, “That’s mighty aggressive use of a Mini”, and I just smiled. “Yes, but it can take it”, I said.

I’ve resolved that I’ll go night diving again, and fairly soon too, so I don’t get “a thing” about it. I’ve told this story to a few people who don’t dive, and they are horrified when I describe the experience. But as I said, I was never in any danger, I never lost my wits, and the guy I was diving with did exactly the right things as well.

Having said that: You better believe I’ll check my mask very, very carefully from now on. فورمولا ون And – I think I’ll dive with a spare, just in case.

Categories
Audio Visual Thoughts and Comments

Idol Gives Back Crap

Hoo boy. So, you know I’m an American Idol fan. I’ve watched the show since the very first episode of the very first season. But.

Words cannot express how utterly and absolutely I hated, loathed, and despised tonight’s episode of “American Idol“.

This season is definitely the worst of all six, by far. This crop of contestants is uninteresting in the extreme. But this week’s episodes – and especially tonight’s 2 hour charity telethon “no results” result show – were the worst of the worst season. This “Idol Gives Back” crap is just that. Crap. Pure and utter.

This reminds me of those uncomfortable times when I was a child, attending a matinee showing at the movie theatre… and before the movie would start, they’d show this little two minute film about a handicapped kid, and then the ushers would pass around these tin plates to gather money. I always resented this… hadn’t I just paid for the movie? I mean, if the theater wants to raise the ticket price by 5 cents and then donate that to charity, fine. But don’t make me feel guilty right before I’m about to watch “Destroy All Monsters!” Even at the age of 8 I thought this approach to charitable contributions stunk.

During last night’s extremely, extremely weak entry of “American Idol”, the Idols sang “inspirational” songs… mostly treacly garbage with one or two good songs thrown in. One (LaKisha Jones) actually sang an Idol finale song from a previous season… and those songs are the worst of the worst. Another (Blake Lewis) copied John Lennon‘s “Imagine“. It was torture. I actually wished very much that Sanjaya was still on to add some much needed entertainment value to these funereal proceedings. Ryan Seacrest actually said – with a straight face – that calling in to vote tonight “may be the most important call you make in your life”. Ho. Lee. Shit. I mean… really.

Remember those bad, bad “Very Special” episodes of Family Ties or Facts of Life that would air in the 80’s? The ones where somebody’s friend did drugs, or some kid was being abused by his parents, or some other heart-wrenching storyliine that felt totally out of place in a comedy? Remember how much you hated them? Remember how you’d make plans with your friends to do something else that night if the preview said “Tonight, on a Very Special episode of…” Well, tonight Ryan Seacrest said, and I quote, “In this Very Special American Idol…” I’m glad I had something bland for dinner, because it certainly would have come up.

That was plenty bad enough. But then they gave us tonight’s crap fest. This, the normal results show, stretched out to two hours while very, very sad “acts” performed on a separate stage in a separate auditorium, combined with green-screen pleas for money from a bunch of second-string celebrities. And at the very end of the show, Bono Christ pops in to give the Idols a three-minute pep talk. Yuck. Yuck. Yuck. The idols even wore all white so they we Get It that they are saints for giving us This Special Treat. Get it?

During the show, Seacrest kept repeating that tonight would be the most shocking results show of al! What was the shock? Oh, I bet you can’t guess. Yes, you got it:, Nobody went home. That’s right, they were all safe! Because it was a show for charity! And they couldn’t send somebody home on a charity show, now could they? (cue more shots of crying, starving children overlaid with the American Idol logo)

I want two hours of my life back. The only reason – the only reason – I sat through this utter and complete garbage was to find out which of the six contestants would be sent packing. I do not care, at all, for this “Oh gosh we’re so sweet we’re not sending anyone home” bullshit. Tivo couldn’t even help me out this time, since I was watching the show live.

American Idol, here me now and hear me good. You pull this crap again, I’m not coming back. Leave charity telethons to Jerry Lewis. This is supposed to be a vapid, voyeuristic, and purely entertaining talent show with no redeeming qualities whatsoever . Knock it off with the pretentiousness, kick someone off every week like you’re supposed to, and entertain me.

Categories
Politics Thoughts and Comments

The Wacky Florida Ferret Freak

We truly live in interesting times.

Thanks to my quick email to a popular blog, I’ve apparently become known as “that crazy guy in Florida who loves ferrets”. This is not an accolade I sought out, I can assure you. Certainly I love my ferret girls and am happy to have them as pets, but I’m far from being a crusader for ferret rights or anything like that. Nevertheless, that’s apparently how I’m being perceived.

Here’s what happened.

On Monday, I was reading Andrew Sullivan’s blog The Daily Dish, a site that I visit several times a day. Sullivan is one of my favorite bloggers, and I’m always interested to hear his take on daily events, as well as see what he’s linking to on any particular day. It so happens that yesterday, he had linked to an article about a poll in San Diego. The title of the link was “Gays vs. Ferrets?

I followed the link to a rather silly article that summarized the results of the poll. Basically, it says that when surveyed about various topics, the residents of San Diego ranked “Gay Marriage” several percentage points above “Legalizing Ferret Ownership” (ferrets are illegal in California, as well as in Hawaii). The headline read “Gay Marriage now more popular than rodents”.

Those who know me know what a stickler I am about biological classifications and cladistics. What annoyed me about the article was the comment that ferrets are “rodents”, when they are quite clearly not. موقع المراهنات Ferrets are carnivores, members of the Mustelid family; taxonomically, they’re in between cats and dogs, perhaps a little closer to dogs than cats. لعبة مباشر Rodents are a completely and totally different class of animal.

In addition, I thought it was pretty funny that the article made it sound like they were actually pitting Gays against Ferrets, when in reality all they were doing was comparing the polling numbers of two completely unrelated questions.

So, I dashed off the following email to Andrew Sullivan on my lunch hour:

Dear Andrew,

Gays versus Ferrets? What am I supposed to do with this information? My partner and I own two ferrets, whom we refer to as “our fuzzy babies”, “the little munchkins”, or simply “The Girls”. Living in Florida, we are prevented from marrying or adopting – but at least they’re not taking our ferrets away from us!

If the poll was based on cuteness, I think my ferrets would probably win, however. You can see them here and judge for yourself. Sad that San Diego expresses its wisdom in endorsing gay marriage, but then displays its ignorance by continuing to ban ferrets.

And by the way, the headline of that article is completely wrong. Ferrets are not rodents, not even close. They are carnivores, same family as minks and raccoons. They’re directly related to both cats and dogs, biologically speaking. Ferrets posses the curiosity and resilience of a cat combined with the rambunctiousness and affection of a dog. They are perfect pets for a fastidious gay couple who like things neat, clean and orderly but who also enjoy a sloppy, furry kiss from an animal when they get home.

I thought it was pretty funny, and I was pleased with myself for coming up with the little double entendre at the end. I sent the email, and forgot all about it.

Until later in the day, when I visited Sullivan’s site again to check on the news… to find that he had quoted almost the entire message, and at that moment, it was the lead item on his web site. Well! I was pretty pleased.

Throughout the day, I got a variety of very nice comments from people who had followed Sullivan’s trackback link to my site, and read about our ferrets Sally and Freddie. To a person, they were all humorous and pleasant comments, including a number from fellow ferret owners.

But not everyone, it seems, felt the same way. Later in the day, I checked Sullivan’s blog again, and found that apparently I’d struck a raw nerve with at least a few people. Sullivan had now posted this message from a vocal ferret critic:

Pace your readers from Florida, ferrets cannot successfully be vaccinated against rabies, and have been recorded on multiple occasions to have gnawed the limbs of small babies, thinking the babies are appropriate prey. Ferrets as pets are illegal in 11 US states and in the City of New York. Several years ago, while I served as associate health commissioner of New York City, I was tasked with dealing with the loonies who styled themselves “Friends of Ferrets.”. David Dinkins’ administration quaked before these animal activists, doubting the wisdom of our orders to euthanize ferrets who had bitten humans. Thank God the Rudy became mayor and in one of his early acts, told the Friends of Ferrets where to put their filthy, smelly and dangerous pet rats.

Sheesh. What a nutball. Not a single true fact in that entire missive. And to top it off, there was that damn “rats/rodents” mixup again. Couldn’t this guy at least checked Wikipedia’s entry on ferrets? I wasn’t going to let it end on a note like that!

So I dashed off the following to Andrew Sullivan:

Dear Andrew,

Well, this debate certainly doesn’t belong on the pages of The Daily Dish, but I cannot be “Fox News’d” by a fellow reader without at least commenting. Feel free to forward this email on to your “associate health commissioner”, and I’ll be happy to carry on this conversation in a more appropriate forum.

Ferrets can’t be vaccinated against rabies? That will certainly come as news to any vet. Ferrets, just like dogs and cats, are vaccinated for rabies in a three-shot sequence during their first year. They’re also vaccinated against distemper at the same time. They are also spayed and neutered at the same age as cats.

Let’s at least get our numbers straight, shall we? Ferrets as pets are illegal in 2 states (California and Hawaii), not 11. In addition, a number of municipalities, such as New York City, have local laws preventing legal ownership of ferrets. Your reader comments on the well-known NYC ban, for example. This has mainly caused controversy because the rest of the state, as well as all surrounding areas, has no such ban – thus causing owners great hardship and consternation during moves.

Like any carnivorous pet, a mistreated or abused ferret can and will bite a human. There was one (and only one, despite urban myths to the contrary) case where a ferret was identified as the culprit in eating a baby’s finger – although New York animal control pointed out that the same household had five cats, three pit bulls, and several large snakes as well… so authorities questioned the automatic presumption that “the ferret did it”. That was the reason the animal was not euthanized in this case.

As far as mistaking a baby for “prey”, this baffles me… Ferrets have been domesticated as hunting animals (much for the same purpose as dachshunds) for thousands of years. They have no natural “prey” of any kind, although their ancestors ate mice and birds. Not much chance of confusing that with a human baby. Ours, for example, will eat nothing except for canned food, no matter what we offer. Our one-year-old nephews plays with both of them all the time, and everyone involved seems to enjoy it. Though my nephew has attempted to bite them several times, they have never bitten him in return. They do lick him a lot, however:



My nephew Ethan plays with Freddie and Sally last Thanksgiving

And then there is the concluding “filthy, smelly, dangerous pet rats” comment… if this (alleged) “associate health commissioner” cannot tell the difference between a rodent (rats, mice, etc) and a carnivorous animal (dogs, cats, ferrets, etc) then perhaps he should reconsider his chosen profession. In addition, ferrets, just like cats, are constantly grooming themselves, and I’ve never seen one with so much as a speck of dirt on it, much less one that could be described as “filthy”. In fact, a ferret will wash itself off in water if they get any type of “filth” on them.

I’m no animal nut; I don’t belong to any ferret group; and I don’t feel the need to beat anyone up over their choice of animal companionship. I’ve had dogs and cats, and I expect to have them again. We got our ferrets after our cat of 17 years died of old age, and we just couldn’t face getting another one just yet. Someone suggested a ferret as a “cross between a cat and a dog”, and it’s worked out well for us. If that’s not your thing, fine. But if someone doesn’t like them, at least say so in a clear and truthful manner. We get enough uninformed opinions in our politics. Can’t we at least talk simple truths when discussing the biological traits of our pets? لعبت بوكر

And so far, that’s it. I feel I did my part to defend my pets without (hopefully) sounding like a crazy person. And thanks to all the folks who visited my site this week due to the Florida Ferret Freak speaking out on The Daily Dish!

Categories
Technology Thoughts and Comments

Things I Don’t Understand About Growing Old: Part I

I am 44 years old as of this writing, and will turn 45 in May of this year. Therefore I am officially “middle aged”, as I understand the term. I find myself studying my older friends, acquaintances, and relatives – as well as older strangers – wondering which of their elderly habits I’m going to pick up when I reach their age.

I’ve been meaning to write myself a series of notes for a long time, which I have been mentally calling “old age warnings to self”. Lately, however, I’ve begun to wonder if such warnings are useless. Are certain things inevitable as one ages? What don’t I know about growing old? Are old age changes constant throughout history, or are they distinctly cultural or generational in nature?

So rather than a series of warnings, I’m going to post these as a series of questions and observations. Perhaps, over the years, I will simply answer them myself as I age. Or, hopefully, other people can send in their answers and advice. I’ll consolidate the answers and advice for future editions of this same column. And we’ll see what we get.

Cars

Why do old people always drive huge, smooshy-riding cars? Is this a function of old age, pure and simple, or is it a cultural or generational thing that just happens to affect individuals in their 60s and 70s at this particular point in time? I’m talking about Lincoln Town Cars, Continentals, Cadillacs, and cars of that sort. These are always domestic vehicles, very long and very wide. Big engines in the front. Big wide seats front and back. Big ass trunks in back. And they drive like boats.

>

The Lincoln Town Car: A Smooshy Drive

I’ve driven these cars numerous times, and I can’t stand them. The power steering is so dialed up that there is hardly any resistance or feedback – you can turn the wheel with your pinky. There is no feeling of actually steering the car at all. When you hit a bump, it’s like you’re driving on pillows – you kind of “smoosh” over it. They have huge turning radiuses; you can just about forget making a U-turn on any normal street. Their hoods are so long I feel like there’s another car in front of me. The air conditioning (or heating, depending on the weather) blasts out so powerfully that even the lowest setting blows my hair out of place. I can’t hear a thing outside of the car, and inside the car the turn signal is so loud I find myself looking for the volume setting somewhere on the dash. In short, I feel like I’m remote operating a simulation of a car in some test facility. It’s so cushioned and removed from the real world that I don’t feel like I’m actually driving.

I cannot see myself ever owning a car like this, no matter what. Frankly, I’d rather not drive at all than drive a car like that. And these cars are driven almost exclusively by people 65 and older. If I see a Lincoln Continental ahead of me on the freeway, I instantly think “old person”, and 90% of the time I am correct. Now, since I never see young people drive these cars, that means… what? That when you turn 65, your taste suddenly changes and you long for a smooshy riding car? Or is it simply that for people born in the 1920s to the 1940s, this type of car represents the ultimate ideal car, which they were finally only able to achieve in retirement?

Right now I drive a Mini Cooper S, which I’ve had modified to drive even tighter and harder than a standard issue Cooper S. Before that, I owned a series of BMW’s. The last domestic car I owned was a Ford Explorer, after which I resolved that I would never, ever buy an American made or designed car again.So, what will happen to me when I turn 65? Will I turn my back on tight suspension vehicles due to encroaching arthritis and osteoporosis in favor of a giant land boat? Or, being a child of the 1960s, will my cultural driving icon in retirement be something very different from that of today’s older folks?

Technology and Gadgets

I love technology. I anxiously latch on to each new gadget I can get my hands on the minute I can get my hands on it. Right now I’m still checking stores for a Wii, and looking forward to June when I can buy an iPhone. I upgrade my computer operating systems and applications the day a new release is available. I replace my computers on average every 18 months. I love learning new computer languages. I read everything I can about upcoming technologies and advances. I do everything I can electronically – banking, insurance, bills, communication, you name it. I’ve had my eyesight laser corrected. I look forward to the day when I can have my genes altered to remove things I don’t want and to add things I do want. In short, I am a technophile to the extreme.



I can’t wait! Will I feel the same way in my 70s?

My parents, on the other hand, live at the opposite end of this spectrum. My father, a retired petroleum engineer, has barely laid hands on a computer since he stopped working, and has no interest in doing so. Neither of my parents so much as uses a debit card – they still write checks by hand for almost every purchase. My father doesn’t trust computers, and actually deposits his checks by waiting in line at a physical bank. He gets cash by writing a check for it in the same manner. They keep their finances solely on handwritten paper.

My mother is a little better. She likes her email, and visits certain websites frequently. She is comfortable enough with modern life that she prints out her airplane boarding pass at home before leaving on a trip, and keeps track of her upcoming cruises on the company’s web site. She watches DVDs, uses a cell phone, and is mulling over the possibility of getting some sort of electronic organizer. But she depends on me (or other young folks in the family) to set these things up for her and to keep them maintained.

And their experience seems to be typical. Yes, there are exceptions – I’ve read lots of things online written by people well past retirement age, and I love Don To Earth, a fantastic blog written by a 93-year-old Nova Scotia scientist. But in my own personal experience, I don’t know anyone past the age of 65 who has any interest in much that is new.

So… will I hit a wall? Will there come a day when my mental desire for everything new simply comes to an end? Or am I a product of my generation, and will continue to embrace every new fangled thing that comes along? Is the technological reticence of today’s elderly a function of being raised in the 20s, 30s and 40s? Or is it just a simple fact of what happens as we get older? I don’t know – but I sure hope it doesn’t happen to me. I’m looking forward to subvocalized phone calls, neural implants, ocular enhancements, and anything and everything else that may come to pass in the time I’ve got left to live.

Music



Now, I’ll be the first to admit that I don’t listen to as much new music as I did when I was in my twenties. Sure. But still, I do my fair sure. Just in the past two years, I’ve discovered Death Cab for Cutie, My Chemical Romance, Green Day (well, re-discovered with American Idiot, in their case), Arctic Monkeys, and even Justin Timberlake. All of those albums blast out of my car stereo at full volume (playing on my 5th generation iPod plugged into my iPod ready Alpine car stereo, of course). I read the reviews both in print and on the web. I subscribe to emusic.com, a great service that lets you download un-DRM’d MP3 tracks of independent artists,. And I try to pay close attention to new music recommended by people whose tastes match mine. The incomparable Wil Wheaton is a great source for this.



Who will I line up to see in 2042?

I still don’t love rap or hip-hop, although I don’t out-and-out hate it like I used to. But then again, I’ve always hated country music, and still do. I consider that a genre preference, and not a time-based one. I’d like to think that I will always want to hear new music, and that I’m still going to be checking out the chart toppers in the 2040s and 2050s. Or am I kidding myself?

When I talk to someone in their 70s about music, I hear about the Andrews Sisters, or if they were really out there, Elvis Presley. They may have heard of current musical acts, but only by name because of their appearance on talk shows or gossip magazines. They don’t listen to any contemporary radio stations or buy any current music. My father repeatedly claims that he literally cannot understand the lyrics in “that rock and roll shit”, and that he does not even feel that it is “singing” at all. When pressed, some older acquaintances of mine will admit that one or two Beatle’s songs aren’t bad, like “Yesterday” and “Hey Jude“, but that’s as far as they’ll go.

So… will I be listening to Born to Run over and over in my 70s? When I’m 79, will I turn off the radio when anything recorded much past the 20th century comes on? Will I tell people that music from the 1980’s was as good as it gets, and it will never get better? Will I be unable to understand the lyrics to the #1 song of 2039? Will I have no clue what the latest music even sounds like when I go in for a DNA rejuvenation treatment in 2042?

Once again, I hope not. I’m sure as time goes on, I’ll have less room for new artists, and will certainly spend more time playing music I already know. But I can’t envision a time when I wouldn’t at least buy five or six new albums a year, minimum, and at the very least make sure I know what the current sound actually is. Am I wrong? Is this another case of advancing age changing my tastes? As my hearing deteriorates, will I become unable to discern the melody in newer musical styles, and thus turn away from them? Will my brain become unable to register pleasure from new tunes, and only provide me with rewarding endorphins when listening to old ones?

These are my questions. I hope I get the answers before I have to experience them firsthand.

Categories
Books Politics Thoughts and Comments

In Praise of The Economist

The Economist. Published Weekly by The Economist Group Limited since 1843. Approximately 90 pages per issue.

I’ve subscribed to a weekly news magazine since my first week at college (that would be August of 1980, by the way). My father subscribed to Time Magazine while I was growing up, so that’s what I got as well. In 1995, I finally got tired of Time’s increasing “Time Warner Corporation” parent bent, and cancelled my subscription. I switched to Newsweek, which I still get delivered to my mailbox once each week. Incidentally, my father still subscribes to Time.

Newsweek is better than Time, but neither of them can hold a candle to The Economist – which tellingly is not owned by any giant media conglomerate. I started reading The Economist a few years ago, and finally subscribed right after the 2004 elections. I was getting so tired of the shrieking news of the mass media, where every subject was So Important That You Must Read It Now, and yet no subject was worth more than a page of coverage. I also got tired of the merger of “non-news” into my news, such as celebrity babies, pop culture happenings, etc. Hey, if I want to read about movie stars, I’ll check out People or Entertainment Weekly, thank you very much.

By contrast, The Economist is the closest thing that exists today to unbiased, unfiltered, raw, just-the-facts-please news. There is very little opinion in The Economist, and what there is is measured and very centered in its approach. The print is tiny (looks to be about 10 point to my eyes), three columns of newsprint on glossy paper, with some pages being almost pure text. It is a news junkie’s dream magazine. When graphs or tables are used, they are clean, simple, and without decoration or exaggeration. They would make Edward Tufte proud

I was prompted to write this entry because of this week’s issue, whose cover article is “Five years on”, and includes a good five pages or so of detailed “where we’ve gone since 9/11” reporting. Unlike the rest of the media, however, there’s none of the shrill tone that accompanies the various “5 Years Since 9/11” celebrations that are going on all this week. Instead, just sober reporting and clear-headed analysis. The Economist neither worships George W. Bush nor does it pillory him. In this issue’s introduction, the editors state that they agreed with the Iraq decision at first, then felt that Bush had conducted the war poorly since. This seems like a pretty reasonable assessment to me (a lot more reasonable than my own analysis, but then again, I make no pretense of being impartial).

In the pages of The Economist, you find out about all the other news that’s going on. Yes, other things have happened apart from some nut making a false confession of murdering a child beauty queen, or the surprise death of a well-liked Australian animal enthusiast. This week alone, there are articles about:

  • The U.S. economy and its relation to the upcoming mid-term elections
  • Synthetic biology
  • Presidential elections in Mexico and Brazil
  • The state of the State of North Korea
  • Europe’s Carmakers
  • The economic prognosis for YouTube

There is very little advertising in The Economist, and you can actually read 10 pages in a row without hitting a single ad. There are no inserted AOL CD’s or thick glued-in booklets advertising the latest GM cars. It is a elegant magazine, from a more civilized age. And yet it’s sharper and more relevant today than it has ever been.

The Economist is best experienced in its print form. Pick up an issue – it’s well worth the cover price. This is a magazine where each issue is almost a book in and of itself. But most importantly, this is a magazine that gives you something that is very rare and precious today: an unencumbered window into the goings-on of the world.

Categories
Thoughts and Comments

Meet the New Ferret

A few weeks ago, our ferret Freddie (that’s Miss Freddie – she’s a girl, despite the name) seemed like she was getting lonely. She was getting more neurotic, hiding her toys and checking on them repeatedly. As Frank says, she was getting even more OCD… And then she stared climbing up onto the chairs, getting on the side tables, and breaking coasters. Something had to be done.

Since we love our little girl, we decided she needed some company. ivermectin horse paste for guinea pigs So, we began looking around, and on July 8th, we found little Miss Sally in our local Pet Supermarket. Little Sally was just 9 weeks old when we got her, and cute as a button. gotas simpiox para que sirven She has a black nose, which makes her look sort of like a little teddie bear to us. It also makes her distinctly different from Freddie, who, being a Sable Mitt ferret, has a pink nose and white paws (in addition to a blaze of white on her chest).

Miss Freddie Spaghetti Miss Sally O’Mally

Sally came home in a cardboard box, furiously scratching for the entire drive, and as soon as we got home we introduced her to Freddie. As ferrets are wont to do, they hit it off right away. Two weeks later, and we’ve purchased a new ferret cage – a Ferret Nation cage two-story deal – plus tons of new toys. And we’ve decided to get into some more elaborate ferret photography as well, so you may see more pictures of our little girls here.

And before someone posts a comment – yes, I realize very well that they are surrogates for children – so what’s wrong with that? We’re two guys in our mid-forties, and I see no problem indulging in some harmless fun with our little furries. They need a loving home, and we need an outlet for our parental emotions. Freddie needed someone to mother, and Sally needed a mother. Everyone’s happy.

I must say that I think ferrets are wonderful pets. They’re cute, they’re clean, and they’re always entertaining. They’re not as cuddly as a dog, but they’re also not aloof like a cat. We get hours of enjoyment watching the two of them wrestle around on the floor, or chase each other around the living room, or play elaborate games of hide and seek.

Freddie, having just broken a coaster,
tries to look innocent
Two pretty girls in a hammock

Ferrets tax your brain as well, since they are incredibly curious critters, and will try to get into everything. They are not a pet for the fainthearted or the easily frustrated. But they’re perfect for us, and we love our girls. ivermectina ribeirao preto You can take a peek at them (assuming they’re in their cage at the moment) by clicking on the web cam link “Ferret Cam” to the right of this article. Any time of the day, stop in and say Hi to Miss Freddie Spaghetti and her sidekick, Miss Sally O’Mally.

They’ll be hosting a tea party soon, I’m sure.

Categories
Thoughts and Comments

We’re Going Solar!

Yesterday, we signed a contract for installing solar heat for our swimming pool and our hot water. We should have it installed in about 2 weeks! We’ll have 11 panels on our roof for heating the pool, an 80-gallon hot water heater for the house, and a small photovoltaic solar electricity panel to provide power to run the hot water heater.

Neither Frank nor I have ever been “Mr. Environmental”. Yes, I like low pollution, and given a choice, I’d rather breath clean air than dirty. And I’m willing to pay more to have something environmentally safe than not. But… I’ve never joined Greenpeace or the Sierra Club or anything at that level. So what gives?

It really boils down to lack of confidence in the government and the energy market. I simply do not trust them. I think they’ll go on blindly thinking there is no problem at all, pinning all their hopes on some “future” solution that’s always 10 years away. Well, I’m tired of waiting for the “perfect” alternative engergy source. I don’t believe them, and I don’t trust them. So I’m taking matters into my own hands. I’d much rather pay a lot more money up front now in order to be independent and secure.

For much the same reasons, Frank is seriously thinking about trading in his sportscar for a Mercedes E320 CDI diesel sedan. Diesel gets a lot better gas mileage, and – you can make your own from vegetable oil if you have to. Plus, in the near term, it’s a little bit cheaper than regular gasoline.

I think Biodiesel is very likely to be one of the those alternative fuels that catches one, and I’m happy to be at the forefront.

And after the solar hot water project is in place, we’re going to slowly start to add photovoltaic electricity (solar electriciy) as well. That will be an even bigger investment, with an even bigger return!

So wake up, folks. Oil is never going to be cheap again, at least not unless the idiots in Washington do something stupid like subsidize it. سباق حصان It’s time to start using other ways, other methods. If Bushy had declared a “war on petroleum” instead of a “war on terrorism”, we’d be 5 years closer to enerby independence and security than we are now… رهان اون لاين and we’d have less to worry about with regards to global warming.

And that’s the other thing. Just as the price of oil is not going to come down, the weather is probably not going to get any better. Scientists now conclude that the 2005 hurricane season was very likely kicked into high gear by global warming. That means we can expect another bad season in 2006… الكزينو and on and on. Which means more power outages, and higher energy costs.

Indepedence and security. It’s worth the money and the aggravation. Tell Bush to go to hell. We’ll just have to fix the country ourselves, one at a time.